🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes added after that and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, where the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. But no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.